MAYOR OF MANCHESTER
Approve as many candidates as you like
A proportional form of approval voting that still keeps local representation
For executive roles like a city mayor, you'd use Approval Voting. Instead of picking just one candidate, you simply vote "yes" (approve) for as many candidates as you like. The candidate with the most "approves" wins.
For elections to Parliament, you would cast a vote for your preferred political party. The goal here is proportional representation, meaning that if your party gets 20% of the votes nationally, they should get roughly 20% of the seats.
When you vote for a party, you can optionally approve individual candidates on their list. Your approvals help decide who gets elected from that party's list if they win seats.
This explains how every vote contributes to a seat. No votes are wasted - if your party doesn't get enough votes for a seat directly, your vote gets transferred to help elect someone else.
Divide remaining unspent votes by remaining seats
Find votes beyond what parties need for their seats
Redistribute from smallest to largest party according to preferences
Parties buy seats they can now afford with transferred votes
Continue until all 650 seats are allocated
Here's what your ballot would look like under this new system:
Manchester Central - May 2029
Approve as many candidates as you like
Choose ONE party, then optionally approve candidates
And more candidates...
Every vote counts toward the final outcome. Fewer "safe seats" or "wasted votes" - your voice matters wherever you live and whoever you support.
Encourages parties to work together and find common ground, leading to more moderate, consensus-based policies.
When every vote matters, more people participate. Countries with proportional systems consistently see higher voter turnout.
Interested in exploring different approaches to democratic representation?